Latin America guide


Foreign Direct investment

FDI stands for Foreign Direct Investment, aadditional benefit is that FDI is thought to
component of a country's national financialbe "bolted down and cannot leave so easily at
accounts. Foreign direct investment isthe first sign of trouble." Unlike short-term
investment of foreign assets into domesticdebt, direct investments in a country are
structures, equipment, and organizations.immediately repriced in the event of a
Foreign direct investment is thought to becrisis. Recent evidence To what extent is
more useful to a country than investments inthere empirical support for such claims of
the equity of its companies because equitythe beneficial impact of Foreign Direct
investments are potentially "hot money" whichInvestment? A comprehensive study by Bosworth
can leave at the first sign of trouble,and Collins (1999) provides evidence on the
whereas FDI is durable and generally usefuleffect of capital inflows on domestic
whether things go well or badly Theinvestment for 58 developing countries during
resilience of foreign direct investment1978-95. The sample covers nearly all of
during financial crises may lead manyLatin America and Asia, as well as many
developing countries to regard it as thecountries in Africa. The authors distinguish
private capital inflow of choice. Althoughamong three types of inflows: Foreign Direct
there is substantial evidence that suchInvestment, portfolio investment, and other
investment benefits host countries, theyfinancial flows (primarily bank loans).
should assess its potential impact carefullyCountries should concentrate on improving the
and realistically Economists tend to favorenvironment for investment and the
the free flow of capital across nationalfunctioning of markets. They are likely to be
borders because it allows capital to seek outrewarded with increasingly efficient overall
the highest rate of return. Unrestrictedinvestment as well as with more capital
capital flows may also offer several otherinflows." Although it is very likely that FDI
advantages. First, international flows ofis higher, as a share of capital inflows,
capital reduce the risk faced by owners ofwhere domestic policies and institutions are
capital by allowing them to diversify theirweak, this cannot be regarded as a criticism
lending and investment. Second, the globalof Foreign Direct Investment per se. Indeed,
integration of capital markets can contributewithout it, the host countries could well be
to the spread of best practices in corporatemuch poorer. Fire sales, adverse selection,
governance, accounting rules, and legaland leverage. Foreign Direct Investment is
traditions. Third, the global mobility ofnot only a transfer of ownership from
capital limits the ability of governments todomestic to foreign residents but also a
pursue bad policies. In addition to thesemechanism that makes it possible for foreign
advantages, which in principle apply to allinvestors to exercise management and control
kinds of private capital inflows,the gains toover host country firms-that is, it is a
host countries from Foreign Direct Investmentcorporate governance mechanism. The transfer
(FDI) can take several other forms: •of control may not always benefit the host
FDI allows the transfer ofcountry because of the circumstances under
technology-particularly in the form of newwhich it occurs, problems of adverse
varieties of capital inputs-that cannot beselection, or excessive leverage. Both
achieved through financial investments oreconomic theory and recent empirical evidence
trade in goods and services. FDI can alsosuggest that Foreign Direct Investment has a
promote competition in the domestic inputbeneficial impact on developing host
market. • Recipients of FDI often gaincountries. But recent work also points to
employee training in the course of operatingsome potential risks: it can be reversed
the new businesses, which contributes tothrough financial transactions; it can be
human capital development in the hostexcessive owing to adverse selection and fire
country. • Profits generated by FDIsales; its benefits can be limited by
contribute to corporate tax revenues in theleverage; and a high share of Foreign Direct
host country. Foreign Direct Investment (Investment in a country's total capital
FDI) versus other flows Despite the stronginflows may reflect its institutions'
theoretical case for the advantages of freeweakness rather than their strength. Though
capital flows, the conventional wisdom nowthe empirical relevance of some of these
seems to be that many private capital flowssources of risk remains to be demonstrated,
pose countervailing risks. many hostthe potential risks do appear to make a case
countries, even when they are in favor offor taking a nuanced view of the likely
capital inflows, view international debteffects of Foreign Direct Investment. Policy
flows, especially of the short-term variety,recommendations for developing countries
as "bad cholestero. In contrast, FDI isshould focus on improving the investment
viewed as "good cholesterol" because it canclimate for all kinds of capital, domestic as
confer the benefits enumerated earlier. Anwell as foreign.



1 A B C D 63 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109