Foreign Direct investment

FDI stands for Foreign Direct Investment, a componentFDI is thought to be "bolted down and cannot leave so
of a country's national financial accounts. Foreign directeasily at the first sign of trouble." Unlike short-term debt,
investment is investment of foreign assets intodirect investments in a country are immediately
domestic structures, equipment, and organizations.repriced in the event of a crisis. Recent evidence To
Foreign direct investment is thought to be more usefulwhat extent is there empirical support for such claims
to a country than investments in the equity of itsof the beneficial impact of Foreign Direct Investment?
companies because equity investments are potentiallyA comprehensive study by Bosworth and Collins
"hot money" which can leave at the first sign of(1999) provides evidence on the effect of capital
trouble, whereas FDI is durable and generally usefulinflows on domestic investment for 58 developing
whether things go well or badly The resilience ofcountries during 1978-95. The sample covers nearly all
foreign direct investment during financial crises mayof Latin America and Asia, as well as many countries
lead many developing countries to regard it as thein Africa. The authors distinguish among three types of
private capital inflow of choice. Although there isinflows: Foreign Direct Investment, portfolio investment,
substantial evidence that such investment benefitsand other financial flows (primarily bank loans).
host countries, they should assess its potential impactCountries should concentrate on improving the
carefully and realistically Economists tend to favor theenvironment for investment and the functioning of
free flow of capital across national borders because itmarkets. They are likely to be rewarded with
allows capital to seek out the highest rate of return.increasingly efficient overall investment as well as with
Unrestricted capital flows may also offer several othermore capital inflows." Although it is very likely that FDI is
advantages. First, international flows of capital reducehigher, as a share of capital inflows, where domestic
the risk faced by owners of capital by allowing thempolicies and institutions are weak, this cannot be
to diversify their lending and investment. Second, theregarded as a criticism of Foreign Direct Investment
global integration of capital markets can contribute toper se. Indeed, without it, the host countries could well
the spread of best practices in corporate governance,be much poorer. Fire sales, adverse selection, and
accounting rules, and legal traditions. Third, the globalleverage. Foreign Direct Investment is not only a
mobility of capital limits the ability of governments totransfer of ownership from domestic to foreign
pursue bad policies. In addition to these advantages,residents but also a mechanism that makes it possible
which in principle apply to all kinds of private capitalfor foreign investors to exercise management and
inflows,the gains to host countries from Foreign Directcontrol over host country firms-that is, it is a corporate
Investment (FDI) can take several other forms:governance mechanism. The transfer of control may
• FDI allows the transfer ofnot always benefit the host country because of the
technology-particularly in the form of new varieties ofcircumstances under which it occurs, problems of
capital inputs-that cannot be achieved through financialadverse selection, or excessive leverage. Both
investments or trade in goods and services. FDI caneconomic theory and recent empirical evidence
also promote competition in the domestic input market.suggest that Foreign Direct Investment has a beneficial
• Recipients of FDI often gain employeeimpact on developing host countries. But recent work
training in the course of operating the new businesses,also points to some potential risks: it can be reversed
which contributes to human capital development in thethrough financial transactions; it can be excessive
host country. • Profits generated by FDIowing to adverse selection and fire sales; its benefits
contribute to corporate tax revenues in the hostcan be limited by leverage; and a high share of Foreign
country. Foreign Direct Investment ( FDI) versus otherDirect Investment in a country's total capital inflows
flows Despite the strong theoretical case for themay reflect its institutions' weakness rather than their
advantages of free capital flows, the conventionalstrength. Though the empirical relevance of some of
wisdom now seems to be that many private capitalthese sources of risk remains to be demonstrated, the
flows pose countervailing risks. many host countries,potential risks do appear to make a case for taking a
even when they are in favor of capital inflows, viewnuanced view of the likely effects of Foreign Direct
international debt flows, especially of the short-termInvestment. Policy recommendations for developing
variety, as "bad cholestero. In contrast, FDI is viewedcountries should focus on improving the investment
as "good cholesterol" because it can confer theclimate for all kinds of capital, domestic as well as
benefits enumerated earlier. An additional benefit is thatforeign.