The Morality of Child Labor

From the comfort of their plush offices and five to sixthey have a right to survive. You can't just say they
figure salaries, self-appointed NGO's often denouncecan't work, you have to provide
child labor as their employees rush from one five staralternatives."Regrettably, the debate is so laden with
hotel to another, $3000 subnotebooks and PDA's inemotions and self-serving arguments that the facts
hand. The hairsplitting distinction made by the ILOare often overlooked.The outcry against soccer balls
between "child work" and "child labor" convenientlystitched by children in Pakistan led to the relocation of
targets impoverished countries while letting its budgetworkshops ran by Nike and Reebok. Thousands lost
contributors - the developed ones -their jobs, including countless women and 7000 of their
off-the-hook.Reports regarding child labor surfaceprogeny. The average family income - anyhow
periodically. Children crawling in mines, faces ashen,meager - fell by 20 percent. Economists Drusilla
body deformed. The agile fingers of famished infantsBrown, Alan Deardorif, and Robert Stern observe
weaving soccer balls for their more privilegedwryly:"While Baden Sports can quite credibly claim that
counterparts in the USA. Tiny figures huddled intheir soccer balls are not sewn by children, the
sweatshops, toiling in unspeakable conditions. It is allrelocation of their production facility undoubtedly did
heart-rending and it gave rise to a veritablenothing for their former child workers and their
not-so-cottage industry of activists, commentators,families."Such examples abound. Manufacturers -
legal eagles, scholars, and opportunistically sympatheticfearing legal reprisals and "reputation risks"
politicians.Ask the denizens of Thailand, sub-Saharan(naming-and-shaming by overzealous NGO's) - engage
Africa, Brazil, or Morocco and they will tell you howin preemptive sacking. German garment workshops
they regard this altruistic hyperactivity - with suspicionfired 50,000 children in Bangladesh in 1993 in anticipation
and resentment. Underneath the compelling argumentsof the American never-legislated Child Labor
lurks an agenda of trade protectionism, theyDeterrence Act.Quoted by Wasserstein, former
wholeheartedly believe. Stringent - and expensive -Secretary of Labor, Robert Reich, notes:"Stopping child
labor and environmental provisions in internationallabor without doing anything else could leave children
treaties may well be a ploy to fend off imports basedworse off. If they are working out of necessity, as
on cheap labor and the competition they wreak onmost are, stopping them could force them into
well-ensconced domestic industries and their politicalprostitution or other employment with greater personal
stooges.This is especially galling since thedangers. The most important thing is that they be in
sanctimonious West has amassed its wealth on theschool and receive the education to help them leave
broken backs of slaves and kids. The 1900 census inpoverty."Contrary to hype, three quarters of all children
the USA found that 18 percent of all children - almostwork in agriculture and with their families. Less than 1
two million in all - were gainfully employed. Thepercent work in mining and another 2 percent in
Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional laws banning childconstruction. Most of the rest work in retail outlets and
labor as late as 1916. This decision was overturnedservices, including "personal services" - a euphemism
only in 1941.The GAO published a report last week infor prostitution. UNICEF and the ILO are in the throes
which it criticized the Labor Department for payingof establishing school networks for child laborers and
insufficient attention to working conditions inproviding their parents with alternative employment.But
manufacturing and mining in the USA, where manythis is a drop in the sea of neglect. Poor countries
children are still employed. The Bureau of Laborrarely proffer education on a regular basis to more
Statistics pegs the number of working childrenthan two thirds of their eligible school-age children. This
between the ages of 15-17 in the USA at 3.7 million.is especially true in rural areas where child labor is a
One in 16 of these worked in factories andwidespread blight. Education - especially for women -
construction. More than 600 teens died of work-relatedis considered an unaffordable luxury by many
accidents in the last ten years.Child labor - let alonehard-pressed parents. In many cultures, work is still
child prostitution, child soldiers, and child slavery - areconsidered to be indispensable in shaping the child's
phenomena best avoided. But they cannot and shouldmorality and strength of character and in teaching him
not be tackled in isolation. Nor should underage laboror her a trade."The Economist" elaborates:"In Africa
be subjected to blanket castigation. Working in the goldchildren are generally treated as mini-adults; from an
mines or fisheries of the Philippines is hardlyearly age every child will have tasks to perform in the
comparable to waiting on tables in a Nigerian or, forhome, such as sweeping or fetching water. It is also
that matter, American restaurant.There are gradationscommon to see children working in shops or on the
and hues of child labor. That children should not bestreets. Poor families will often send a child to a richer
exposed to hazardous conditions, long working hours,relation as a housemaid or houseboy, in the hope that
used as means of payment, physically punished, orhe will get an education."A solution recently gaining
serve as sex slaves is commonly agreed. That theysteam is to provide families in poor countries with
should not help their parents plant and harvest may beaccess to loans secured by the future earnings of
more debatable.As Miriam Wasserman observes intheir educated offspring. The idea - first proposed by
"Eliminating Child Labor", published in the Federal BankJean-Marie Baland of the University of Namur and
of Boston's "Regional Review", second quarter ofJames A. Robinson of the University of California at
2000, it depends on "family income, education policy,Berkeley - has now permeated the mainstream.Even
production technologies, and cultural norms." About athe World Bank has contributed a few studies, notably,
quarter of children under-14 throughout the world arein June, "Child Labor: The Role of Income Variability and
regular workers. This statistic masks vast disparitiesAccess to Credit Across Countries" authored by
between regions like Africa (42 percent) and LatinRajeev Dehejia of the NBER and Roberta Gatti of the
America (17 percent).In many impoverished locales,Bank's Development Research Group.Abusive child
child labor is all that stands between the family unit andlabor is abhorrent and should be banned and
all-pervasive, life threatening, destitution. Child laboreradicated. All other forms should be phased out
declines markedly as income per capita grows. Togradually. Developing countries already produce millions
deprive these bread-earners of the opportunity to liftof unemployable graduates a year - 100,000 in
themselves and their families incrementally aboveMorocco alone. Unemployment is rife and reaches, in
malnutrition, disease, and famine - is an apex ofcertain countries - such as Macedonia - more than one
immoral hypocrisy.Quoted by "The Economist", athird of the workforce. Children at work may be
representative of the much decried Ecuador Bananaharshly treated by their supervisors but at least they
Growers Association and Ecuador's Labor Minister,are kept off the far more menacing streets. Some
summed up the dilemma neatly: "Just because theykids even end up with a skill and are rendered
are under age doesn't mean we should reject them,employable.