Economic Development in Latin America

Economic development in Latin America has been awhich instigated President John Kennedy to put phase
matter of great debate since they becamethree into motion.Modernization theorists persuaded
independent. In the nineteenth century, Europe and theKennedy to help modernize Latin America in the belief
United States thought the reason why there was athat if they did so, the Latin American countries would
lack of development among Latin American countriescommit them to capitalism and democracy, and not
was because they were racially inferior and Catholic. Inbecome communistic. Promoting health care and
the twentieth century, the reasons advanced was thateducation was most important to President Kennedy
they are backwards and uneducated. Latin Americanbecause Castro was very successful in implementing
countries assert their lack of development is notthese two reforms in Cuba. The plan implemented in
because of the theories that first world countries putLatin America was very similar to the Marshall Plan,
forth, but rather due to the fact that those samewhich had been used for European countries after
countries have stolen much of their mineral wealth andWorld War II. The downfall to this phase was that in
agricultural products during the colonial period. SinceLatin America they were not re-creating democracy,
their independence, Latin American countries havebut rather creating it which was much more difficult.By
went through four phases of economic1968 this phase was failing and revolutions broke out
development.Between 1821 and 1880, the first phaseagain. From 1982 to the present, there has been a
consisted of classic liberalism. This type of economyreturn to nineteenth century liberalism, called
consisted of free trade, and opening the country toneo-liberalism. This economic policy includes open
foreign investment. Many of the Latin Americanmarkets, foreign investors, and globalism, such as
countries produced a mono-crop economy, whichNAFTA. This is similar in many respects to the policies
made them very vulnerable to fluctuations in foreignexisting in the creation of the European Union, but does
markets. Classic liberalism did create some economicnot include open borders between the United States
growth in the form of railroads, telegraphs, port works,and Mexico. The probable reason for keeping the
and financial institutions. However this type of growthborders closed is that illegal immigrants will work for
benefited the wealthy only; it did nothing for the lowersubstantially less than they would if the borders were
classes. As a result of this economic instability, revoltsopen. Foreign investment in Latin American countries
occurred among Latin American countries.The secondalso benefit the capitalists much more than the people
phase of economic development was importof the countries themselves because the capitalists do
substitution industrialization (ISI). Foreign capitalists werenot have the same requirements to provide job
driven out of the countries. For example, Mexicobenefits to those workers that they would have in the
nationalized oil and railroads, thereby forcing outUnited States, such as workman's compensation,
Standard Oil and Andrew Carnegie. Latin Americanhealth insurance, and minimum wage standards.While I
countries closed their borders and instituted laws thathave not determined yet if America should have open
foreigners could not own the majority interest inborders, I do think that foreign investors should be
businesses. The government began subsidizing Latinrequired to conduct business in Latin America countries
American businesses, but this plan did not lead tothe same as they do in the United States. By this I
economic prosperity. By 1959, the countries hadmean the people of those countries should have the
minimal development and bad economic problems,same work benefits prescribed by American law to
such as inflation, poor quality goods at exorbitanttheir workers. By foreign investors neglecting this, they
prices, and agricultural societies suffering due to theare simply exploiting the workers for their own profits
government subsidizing industries and not them. Thesuch as was seen in the United States in the beginning
Cuban revolution caused many Latin Americanof our industrialization.Mary Arnold is an author on
countries to consider their own communist revolution,which is a site for Creative Writers.