Anti-Corruption Strategies

Anti-corruption strategies must go beyond blanketfor obtaining information about the wealth of public
condemnations. Privately, at least, one must be veryservants. But despite its powers, at first no one
shrewd about where to begin and how. One mustbelieved that the ICAC would succeed any more than
involve local people in the analysis of the costs andprevious efforts to rewrite laws and create
benefits of various kinds of corruption in internationalinvestigatory bodies. Credibility came when the
business transactions in the country in question. Whenex-police chief of Hong Kong, Peter Godber, was
deciding what to do first, one must keep in mind theextradited from retirement in England and punished in
need to begin with a quick success, and then attackHong Kong. The ICAC also nailed the ex-number two
areas with highest benefit-cost ratios.and scores of other high-ranking police officials.
An anti-corruption effort should not try to do too manyTo a cynical public and a hardened civil service, frying
things at once, but to launch a campaign that tries tothese big fish sent a credible signal: "The rules of the
break the culture of corruption. (1 will discuss thegame really have changed."
principle of the big fish in a moment.)Mexico is famously corrupt, but most observers
In short, then, a generic model for a country programbelieve that things have improved markedly under
would include:o Participatory diagnoses by local peoplePresident Carlos Salinas de Gortari. He, too, created
of the problems, their extent, and their causes (morenew capabilities of investigation and enforcement. But
on how to do this below);o A combination of a systemhis efforts too were originally greeted with disbelief.
of structural reforms carefully sequenced with aHad not his predecessor Miguel de la Madrid called for
politically powerful message and some earlya "renovation " but failed to stem corruption? Salinas
successes to gain credibility;o Which areas first: wheredid not gain credibility until his enforcers pounced on the
the public perceives the problem (e.g., extortion innotorious head of the Pemex syndicate, on a leading
Philippines; licensing bureau in Venezuela; police andnarcotics trafficker, and on three high-powered
courts in many countries); where the economic costsbusiness people who had fiddled with the Mexican
the greatest (actions that distort policies as opposed tostock exchange. One of the latter was the head of
who gets a specific contract); where easiest to makeSalinas own campaign in one state. The message: If
a difference in the benefit-cost sense;o Getting big fishthese big fish can be caught and fried, political impunity
(many ways to get). Illicit wealth as criteria. Peopleis a thing of the past.
know who is corrupt, yet most charges are false inItaly recent and unprecedented success in attacking
public hot lines etc. Has to be within the ruling party orcorruption has attracted worldwide attention. The
not credible;o Reforms of incentives (first the easycrucial first step was frying a top Mafia official, many
ones revenue-raising areas), then systematic reformstop business executives, and several major politicians
beginning with objectives, on to measures, and finally tofrom the ruling party. This told the public that if they
pay-performance links; ando Greater transparency.came forward and denounced crime and corruption,
Denouncing and prosecuting a few big-timethey could make a difference.
perpetrators of bribery, extortion, smuggling, taxThere are more recent examples of big fish being
evasion, and other illicit activities. But to learn this lessonfried, such as Venezuela, Brazil, Japan. Around the
from recent international experience, people must alsoworld we are witnessing a transformation as important
learn one more: successful campaigns againstas the democratic reforms of the 1980s. There is an
corruption do not stop with denunciations. They goemerging consensus that democracy without good
beyond the prosecution of individuals to the systematicgovernment is a charade, just as privatization without
reform of information and incentives in both the publiccompetition is a charade. The 1990s are becoming the
and private sectors.decade of institutional adjustment, meaning the
First some examples : Hong Kong used to be awashimprovement of the institutions through which states
in corruption. Then in 1973 a new Independentand markets function. And the first step in this
Commission against Corruption was formed. It hadtransformation turns out to require dramatic action
new teeth, and new eyes. It possessed powers toagainst high-level abusers of existing institutions.
investigate suspected offenders and had new means