Defaulting in Silence - HIRE Act Introduces Currency Exchange Controls in USA

The first thing that came to mind when I read theWhat kind of payments are included? Almost anything.
hidden provisions starting on page 27 of the newThe act specifically mentions "interest, dividends, rent,
H.I.R.E Act - short for "Hiring Incentives to Restoresalaries, wages, premiums, annuities, compensations,
Employment" - was the phrase "Get Your Money Outremunerations... and any gross proceeds from the sale
of the Country, Before Your Country Gets Youror other disposition of any property of a type which
Money out of You."can produce interest or dividends from sources within
That expression was coined years back in one of thethe United States... "
classic offshore investing books. Today, it appearsThis is incredible stuff. The section after the section
more vital than ever - not just for our Americanabout foreign bank accounts goes on to talk about
cousins but for anybody with assets held in the globalforeign financial assets, including for example stocks,
financial system, which is still dominated by the USnot just offshore bank accounts. Any holdings of
dollar. If the HIRE Act is not a wake-up call to thoseforeign stocks over $50,000 will have to be reported
without a detailed exit strategy in place, then I don'tby US taxpayers. And this provision kicks in earlier -
know what is. The US government today is 'defaultingstarting with the next tax year. It's what we expected
in silence.'for the past few years: reporting requirements being
The offending legislation in a nutshell? Many transfersexpanded beyond foreign financial accounts.
of money from the US to overseas entities areEconomic Isolation of the United States?
subject to a new tax equal to 30 percent of the totalThis legislation is typical gung-ho 'you're either with us,
amount of the payment - unless the payment is sentor against us' stuff.
to a foreign bank that has agreed to report allTreasury minions seem to think the USA has enough
American-owned accounts automatically andeconomic power to be able to enforce all this
electronically to the US government, and/or unless theextra-territorial legislation on foreign banks. I honestly
beneficiary agrees to disclose voluntarily its ownershipthink they believe that. But they may be in for a
information to the IRS.surprise.
The HIRE Act sounds harmless enough, right? ItBankers have tolerated a lot, always trying to hard to
sounds like something to do with job creation... yetcomply with the latest mandates. A few years back,
another round of incentives. Yet, hidden starting oneverybody was trying hard to produce compliant
page 27, is America's widest reaching attack yet onfinancial services products for the US market. But
offshore banks.based on my candid discussions with bankers around
"It couldn't have happened to a nicer country," writesthe world, I can tell you that rebellion is fomenting on
analyst Tyler Durden on "... As it was merely the latestthe Bahnhofstrasse. Even the most conservative
in an endless stream of acts destined to expand the'straight arrow' bankers are now asking themselves, "Is
government payroll to infinity, nobody cared about it, orcompliance with US law really possible?"
actually read it. Because if anyone had read it, the actThe answer, in many cases, is no. It is simply not
would have been known as the Capital Controls Act."possible to comply with US law, and run a business
I think he's absolutely right that nobody read it. Thecomplying with local laws and client demand. And with
mainstream media didn't pick up on it, any more thanthe regulations tightening all the time, I can see many
they gave any indication of what Obama's muchpeople who have tried extremely hard to be
hyped healthcare bill actually says.law-abiding citizens will simply decide that the time has
A few days later, however, Mark Nestmann, on hisnow arrived to become criminals in the eyes of the US
blog, writes that Durden's article is "highly misleading."government.
The HIRE Act, says Nestmann, isn't about capitalA lot of banks will be both unwilling and even unable to
controls, at least not directly. It's about enforcement ofcomply. They will instead do things their own way and
existing IRS rules.start blatantly to ignore US laws. A few years ago we
So, there's some debate about whether this is reallywould never have thought of conservative, reputable
about currency controls, or just the taxman doing hisand respectable institutions taking this attitude. But now
job. I guess it all boils down to your definition ofwe are seeing it happening.
currency controls.The price to pay for financial institutions that make that
As it happens, in my humble opinion, Dryden anddecision will be total isolation from the US banking
Nestmann are both right. The HIRE Act is certainly notsystem. They won't be able to handle US investments
a typical old-fashioned exchange control mechanism.or US dollars for any clients - American or foreign.
But then, the stealth devaluation of the dollar is noThere is a big wide world out there, and whether or
typical devaluation! The US Treasury and Fed officialsnot you are bullish on BRICs, you probably agree with
who are doing this are much more sophisticated than,me that the future does not belong to the United
say, Hugo Chavez of Venezuela with his currencyStates. So I think these banks that choose isolation
controls and devaluations. Perhaps a better word is sly.from the US can still run profitable, stable and
It would never suit the US politically or financially tosuccessful businesses. In fact, freeing themselves from
introduce old-fashioned exchange controls, of the typeall this costly compliance could make their bottom lines
the UK had up until 1979 and France, Spain and Italymuch better... and reducing their exposure to US dollars
had through until the nineties. Of course, the Chinese -undoubtedly makes good business sense anyway,
who basically control the US dollar, as the majorgiven how the Fed just keeps on printing.
holders of its debt - would never allow exchangeThe only question is, how many banks will do this? If it's
controls. Neither would American conservatives.just a few, they will be the isolated ones. But if the
There is, however, an even darker and deeper reasonrebellion grows, finally it will be the United States of
still why the US will not introduce explicit exchangeAmerica that will be isolated from the world financial
controls. Recently, Gloom-Boom-Doom guru Marcsystem.
Faber wrote that printing money represents a silentVery Un-American?
way for governments to default on their debt. When aThere is one simple, albeit radical, step that Americans
government openly defaults on its debt, says Faber,can take to rid themselves once and for all of this
the workout process is reasonably equitable. But if aproblem: change their citizenships. The steady flow of
government devalues silently by printing, the burden ofAmericans doing just that is likely to increase
the default isn't shared equally. Those who hold morephenomenally over the short to medium term.
of the currency being devalued, in this case US dollars,Many US citizens are entitled to new citizenships
are disproportionately hit.already, without even knowing it, due to ancestry. If the
Inevitably those hit hardest are not big sophisticatedcitizen's parents or grand-parents were born overseas,
international banksters, who have hedged their riskthen they can likely apply for a foreign citizenship.
through complex financial instruments, but smallOtherwise, they can acquire a second citizenship either
investors who have simply never thought of hedgingthrough naturalization (usually after a few years of
against currency risk. This stealth devaluation is nothingresidence) or by economic citizenship - that is the paid
more than a way of stealing from average Americansoption.
who have savings in their retirement accounts, in orderThe paid option is currently only available in two
to keep America's creditors pacified and maintain thecountries in the world: The Commonwealth of
USA's superpower status.Dominica, and the Federation of St Kitts and Nevis. I
What the HIRE Act represents, in my view, is a slickhave heard on the grapevine, however, that there may
form of currency control via the back door. Thebe other new players, or perhaps older players coming
bottom line is it makes it much harder to move capitalback to the market, in this business quite soon. I can't
out of the USA. I would choose to define a currencysay more at the moment, but feel free to contact me
control as something that places restrictions onvia the Q Wealth offices for a personal consultation if
movement of capital. By that definition, this is clearly ayou are interested in being personally informed of such
currency control. If you take a narrower definition,options as - or even before - they become available.
maybe this is an enforcement action not an exchangeIs this unpatriotic? I suppose it is in a way, but
control. Semantics, however, don't affect the netgovernments try very hard to confuse patriotism and
result... which Nestmann certainly agrees is verynationalism in the collective psyche. In fact, a passport
negative.is just a piece of paper representing your relationship
The Immediate Fallout - Account Closures andwith a certain government - or, as some would say,
Withholding by Defaultyour control by a certain government.
There are two net effects of this legislation:What About The Rest of the World?
First, it provides a huge disincentive for foreign banksCitizens of other countries have it relatively easy -
to deal with Americans. Foreign banks that stillthey can legally escape all this simply by moving to
welcomed American account holders are now askinganother country (with a little careful advance planning,
Americans to close accounts.obviously). Foreign banks will not refuse to do business
Secondly, it will also have US banks running scared.with Brits, Canadians or Australians.
Sure... there are many kinds of transactions where theHowever, the devaluation of fiat currencies is a global
tax does not apply. But up until now, it wasn't really thephenomena. The Bank of England and the European
bank's business why you were transferring funds,Central Bank are very much in cahoots with Federal
provided they didn't have any reason to suspect theReserve. By devaluing all three currencies at more or
funds were of criminal origin. When this legislationless the same rate, they are further adding to 'stealth
comes into force, however, banks in the US will havedevaluation' tactics. If the exchange rates stay broadly
conduct an in-depth investigation into the purpose ofsimilar, the masses won't realise what's going on.
the transaction, the beneficiary, and the receiving bank,Other major currencies, too, maintain pegs to the dollar
in order to decide whether or not they are required toand the euro - so they too will participate. The Swiss
withhold tax. If they get it wrong, they will be liable forCentral Bank, for example, has a policy of maintaining
the tax they should have deducted... so they willthe Swiss Franc-Euro rate within a certain margin. And
naturally err on the side of caution.numerous Latin American countries try to shadow the
As I see it, US banks now have little choice but todollar. The solution? Buy gold of course.
introduce withholding by default, shifting the burden ofOf perhaps greater concern, however, to citizens of
proof to the account holder requesting the transfer,many countries around the world is the threat of
who will have to demonstrate that the transaction iscurrency controls. Our feeling is that the Euro zone
not subject to withholding tax.and the UK will follow the American example and try
This is very similar, albeit different, to many existingto stem the tide of capital flowing out at some point
exchange control regimes. Think Venezuela, Brazil orsoon. The time to prepare is now.
South Africa for example... where in order to transferOur advice on how to prepare is not new, but bears
funds abroad, people must present a mountain ofrepeating:
paperwork, permits etc. Holding of foreign bank- Open foreign bank accounts while you can
accounts, under traditional exchange control regimes, is- Look for non-reportable overseas investments like
either frowned upon or prohibited outright with strictgold bullion or real estate
penalties for anyone who is caught.- Try to develop offshore income streams so you are
Oh, and that reminds me, I almost forgot to mention theless reliant on the economy of any particular country If
penalties introduced in the HIRE Act... $50,000 foryou haven't already started on the path to acquiring at
non-reporting... 30% automatically for being a so-calledleast an offshore residence, and preferably a passport
'recalcitrant account holder' who refuses full disclosure...too, for you and your family - then get started without
etc etc.delay.
Scope of the New Controls